Monday, February 18, 2019

See How Court Stops EFCC From Declaring Maina Wanted

find breaking news, latestnews, the news, new, world news, daily news, international news, breaking news, latest breaking news, news breaking news, breaking news america, the breaking news, the latest breaking news, breaking the news, breaking news breaking news, breaking news video, breaking news worldwide, latest news breaking news, up breaking news, breaking news this week, news, new, daily news, local news, the news, latestnews, fresh news, news headlines, headline news, latest news headlines, recent news headlines, live news headlines, yesterday news headlines, the latest news headlines, local news headlines, latest news and headlines, world news tonight headlines, channels news headlines, news and headlines, ten news headlines, news headlines abc, the news headlines, friday news headlines, headline news stories, headline news latest, the headline news, the latest headline news

The Federal High Court in Abuja has stopped the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission from declaring wanted, a former Chairman of the Presidential Task Force on Pension Reforms Mr. Abdulrasheed Maina, who was suspected of complicity in diversion of pension funds.

The EFCC had declared him wanted after news broke in 2017 that Maina, who had been dismissed from the federal civil service in 2013 on the basis of the corruption charges leveled against him, had been reinstated.

But in her judgment delivered on January 31, 2019, Justice Folasade Giwa-Ogunbanjo, held that the EFCC could not declare Maina wanted without first obtaining a court order.

Delivering judgment in the suit filed by Maina on September 5, 2018, Justice Giwa-Ogunbajo ruled that the EFCC could not exercise its powers under sections 1(2)(c), 6, 7, 13 of the EFCC Act without recourse to court.

A certified true copy of her judgment reads in part, “The plaintiff’s second prayer is a declaration that without recourse to any safeguard in sections 35, 37, 41 and 42 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), including a judicial intervention.

This includes order of court pursuant to sections 1(1), 8(1) and 42(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015, the 1st defendant cannot lawfully exercise its discretion, powers and or functions under sections 1(2)(C), 6, 7, 13 of the Economic and Financial Crimes Act, 2004, ditto section 4 of the Police Act, 2004 within the confines of the law.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

What is Your Opinion on This, Use The Comment Box Below: